Denying Blunders
If Department of Justice(DOJ) secretary Laila De Lima wherein she now face not only contempt and possible jailing for her defiance from Supreme Court ‘s temporary restraining order (TRO) but also a disbarment case against her, is truly practicing the rule of law and just as she claim, why does her action is tainted with anti-GMA agenda or with Bias action instead of being fair and neutral(for that what Justice means, it is neither side of any political party ),like violating the temporary restraining order (TRO) with a reason coming from Anti-GMA camp; like foolishly believing a text message from unknown source only because the name of Mrs. Arroyo is involved in it that Mrs. Arroyo is seeking political asylum from Dominican Republic and Spain without validating or confirming it first from the said countries before disclosing it to the public; alleging the doctors of Mrs. Arroyo, as well as having personal malice that Mrs. Arroyo is just mere malingering and have no life-threatening disease without any evidences; not respecting the decision of the court that Hubert Webb is not guilty but still accept evidences that will jeopardize Hubert Webb; etc.?
She cannot reason out that she is just doing her job and following the orders of PNoy for actually she is not doing her job as secretary of Department of Justice but rather obviously acting as a defense lawyer of Noynoy camp instead.
See, in her defenses, there is her bias against the Arroyo camp which she should not be because she is not a defense lawyer of the Yellow camp but a secretary of Justice.
In my opinion, it is only right she will be disbarred because she is not doing her job as secretary of Justice and not practicing fairness and rule of law in her treatment to the Arroyo camp for she acts bias and unprofessional(with her blunders and denial of them)
